<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Text Ad Format Myths – Optimization’s goal is determining one “best” ad layout</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.yieldbuild.com/2007/10/01/text-ad-format-myths-%e2%80%93-optimization%e2%80%99s-goal-is-determining-one-%e2%80%9cbest%e2%80%9d-ad-layout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.yieldbuild.com/2007/10/01/text-ad-format-myths-%e2%80%93-optimization%e2%80%99s-goal-is-determining-one-%e2%80%9cbest%e2%80%9d-ad-layout/</link>
	<description>Internet Ad Optimization Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 14:11:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Text Ad Format Myths &#124; Optimizing AdSense</title>
		<link>http://blog.yieldbuild.com/2007/10/01/text-ad-format-myths-%e2%80%93-optimization%e2%80%99s-goal-is-determining-one-%e2%80%9cbest%e2%80%9d-ad-layout/comment-page-1/#comment-1037</link>
		<dc:creator>Text Ad Format Myths &#124; Optimizing AdSense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.yieldbuild.com/?p=9#comment-1037</guid>
		<description>[...] 1. Bigger ads produce better yields 2. Ads that blend into the page background perform better 3. Optimization’s goal is determining one “best” ad layout 4. Once you’ve created an optimized set of layouts for a page, you’re done 5. All site visitors [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1. Bigger ads produce better yields 2. Ads that blend into the page background perform better 3. Optimization’s goal is determining one “best” ad layout 4. Once you’ve created an optimized set of layouts for a page, you’re done 5. All site visitors [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Gabriner</title>
		<link>http://blog.yieldbuild.com/2007/10/01/text-ad-format-myths-%e2%80%93-optimization%e2%80%99s-goal-is-determining-one-%e2%80%9cbest%e2%80%9d-ad-layout/comment-page-1/#comment-1035</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Gabriner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 22:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.yieldbuild.com/?p=9#comment-1035</guid>
		<description>Although I agree with most of your tips, this one I am not sure of.  Granted, we will never find the &quot;best&quot; layout available, but assuming a finite set of layouts, each one will have a given performance depending on where it is used, for what users, and what time of day (along with other more complicated factors).  If you are going to broadly have a layout run on a set of pages, I would say having the best performing that you are aware of, rather than an even rotation of say the top 3.

In an ideal world, you will find out which of your top 3 performs best in what circumstances, and apply them each 100% of the time to their respective areas.  But it sounds like you are saying that applying an even rotation of layouts with different performance would be better than simply using the top.  It is this specific point that I disagree with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I agree with most of your tips, this one I am not sure of.  Granted, we will never find the &#8220;best&#8221; layout available, but assuming a finite set of layouts, each one will have a given performance depending on where it is used, for what users, and what time of day (along with other more complicated factors).  If you are going to broadly have a layout run on a set of pages, I would say having the best performing that you are aware of, rather than an even rotation of say the top 3.</p>
<p>In an ideal world, you will find out which of your top 3 performs best in what circumstances, and apply them each 100% of the time to their respective areas.  But it sounds like you are saying that applying an even rotation of layouts with different performance would be better than simply using the top.  It is this specific point that I disagree with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
