<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Contextual Advertising Networks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.yieldbuild.com/2008/07/09/contextual-advertising-networks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.yieldbuild.com/2008/07/09/contextual-advertising-networks/</link>
	<description>Internet Ad Optimization Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 19:10:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://blog.yieldbuild.com/2008/07/09/contextual-advertising-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-3101</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 19:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.yieldbuild.com/2008/07/09/contextual-advertising-networks/#comment-3101</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using Google&#039;s Adsense and Chitika for years, but recently I&#039;ve been seeing surprisingly good performance from Netseer (http://www.netseer.com/), despite the fact that it takes two clicks to monetize a visitor (the displayed ad unit shows content related keywords - when a visitor clicks on one, s/he is taken to a landing page where the actual ads are &quot;housed&quot;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Google&#8217;s Adsense and Chitika for years, but recently I&#8217;ve been seeing surprisingly good performance from Netseer (<a href="http://www.netseer.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.netseer.com/</a>), despite the fact that it takes two clicks to monetize a visitor (the displayed ad unit shows content related keywords &#8211; when a visitor clicks on one, s/he is taken to a landing page where the actual ads are &#8220;housed&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mayur</title>
		<link>http://blog.yieldbuild.com/2008/07/09/contextual-advertising-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-2968</link>
		<dc:creator>Mayur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Nov 2010 13:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.yieldbuild.com/2008/07/09/contextual-advertising-networks/#comment-2968</guid>
		<description>This list is good but vibrant media, looksmart and kontera are inline ads. I am looking for an alternative for google adsense, also the fill rate matters. I think only google adsense have a highest fill rate, which other network has the highest fill rate for contextual ads?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This list is good but vibrant media, looksmart and kontera are inline ads. I am looking for an alternative for google adsense, also the fill rate matters. I think only google adsense have a highest fill rate, which other network has the highest fill rate for contextual ads?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: isabel</title>
		<link>http://blog.yieldbuild.com/2008/07/09/contextual-advertising-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-2890</link>
		<dc:creator>isabel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.yieldbuild.com/2008/07/09/contextual-advertising-networks/#comment-2890</guid>
		<description>hey guys. ive been working with altitudedigitalpartners.com and they have been great! they are so helpful, and are always there to answer the phone and their CPMs are higher than most of the top networks that we&#039;ve worked with in the past. Also the pay on time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey guys. ive been working with altitudedigitalpartners.com and they have been great! they are so helpful, and are always there to answer the phone and their CPMs are higher than most of the top networks that we&#8217;ve worked with in the past. Also the pay on time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlo Barbosa</title>
		<link>http://blog.yieldbuild.com/2008/07/09/contextual-advertising-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-2373</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlo Barbosa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 19:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.yieldbuild.com/2008/07/09/contextual-advertising-networks/#comment-2373</guid>
		<description>DirectCPV.com is a CPV / PPV Contextual Advertising Network.  Advertisers will either get a full page popup ad or interstitial ad served when they set up their campaigns.  All they have to do is enter a list of keywords and domain targets and the DirectCPV system does the rest.  Minimum deposit is only $100.  Sign up at http://www.directcpv.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DirectCPV.com is a CPV / PPV Contextual Advertising Network.  Advertisers will either get a full page popup ad or interstitial ad served when they set up their campaigns.  All they have to do is enter a list of keywords and domain targets and the DirectCPV system does the rest.  Minimum deposit is only $100.  Sign up at <a href="http://www.directcpv.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.directcpv.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Gabriner</title>
		<link>http://blog.yieldbuild.com/2008/07/09/contextual-advertising-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-1039</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Gabriner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 01:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.yieldbuild.com/2008/07/09/contextual-advertising-networks/#comment-1039</guid>
		<description>Other than the fact that the output from each Network is different, and the way in which you call them to get the ads is different, what is the difference in using the different platforms?  Have you found anywhere that someone performs better than Google?

Over at CNET, we use the other Networks as backfill, incase Google does not have enough results, but I have never actually seen anything perform better.  What advantages do you see in using the other networks, and when does it apply?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other than the fact that the output from each Network is different, and the way in which you call them to get the ads is different, what is the difference in using the different platforms?  Have you found anywhere that someone performs better than Google?</p>
<p>Over at CNET, we use the other Networks as backfill, incase Google does not have enough results, but I have never actually seen anything perform better.  What advantages do you see in using the other networks, and when does it apply?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outfiniguinna</title>
		<link>http://blog.yieldbuild.com/2008/07/09/contextual-advertising-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-1019</link>
		<dc:creator>Outfiniguinna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 03:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.yieldbuild.com/2008/07/09/contextual-advertising-networks/#comment-1019</guid>
		<description>Tahnks for posting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tahnks for posting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

