<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Larger banner ads debut on NYT, WSJ &amp; other top sites</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.yieldbuild.com/2009/03/10/larger-banner-ads-debut-on-nyt-wsj-other-top-sites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.yieldbuild.com/2009/03/10/larger-banner-ads-debut-on-nyt-wsj-other-top-sites/</link>
	<description>Internet Ad Optimization Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Mar 2011 19:10:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Veličina nije važna, bar kada je o online reklamnim formatima reč &#124; Win Win Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.yieldbuild.com/2009/03/10/larger-banner-ads-debut-on-nyt-wsj-other-top-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-2321</link>
		<dc:creator>Veličina nije važna, bar kada je o online reklamnim formatima reč &#124; Win Win Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 20:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.yieldbuild.com/2009/03/10/larger-banner-ads-debut-on-nyt-wsj-other-top-sites/#comment-2321</guid>
		<description>[...] pažnju. Ovo istraživanje je vršeno u prethodne 3 godine, pa u njega nisu uključeni neki od novih formata banera, pa ga zato treba uzeti sa rezervom. Jos neke interpretacije rezultata ove studije, zajedno sa [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pažnju. Ovo istraživanje je vršeno u prethodne 3 godine, pa u njega nisu uključeni neki od novih formata banera, pa ga zato treba uzeti sa rezervom. Jos neke interpretacije rezultata ove studije, zajedno sa [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Menayan</title>
		<link>http://blog.yieldbuild.com/2009/03/10/larger-banner-ads-debut-on-nyt-wsj-other-top-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1760</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Menayan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 01:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.yieldbuild.com/2009/03/10/larger-banner-ads-debut-on-nyt-wsj-other-top-sites/#comment-1760</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right - ads meeting these specs are effectively restricted to OPA member sites (i.e. large, high-quality sites with their own internal ad sales forces). But eventually, it&#039;s easy to imagine ad sizes that there&#039;s plenty of inventory for drifting over to intermediates. Then, the onus will be to innovate again. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right &#8211; ads meeting these specs are effectively restricted to OPA member sites (i.e. large, high-quality sites with their own internal ad sales forces). But eventually, it&#8217;s easy to imagine ad sizes that there&#8217;s plenty of inventory for drifting over to intermediates. Then, the onus will be to innovate again. <img src='http://blog.yieldbuild.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Edmondson</title>
		<link>http://blog.yieldbuild.com/2009/03/10/larger-banner-ads-debut-on-nyt-wsj-other-top-sites/comment-page-1/#comment-1759</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Edmondson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.yieldbuild.com/2009/03/10/larger-banner-ads-debut-on-nyt-wsj-other-top-sites/#comment-1759</guid>
		<description>What I think is interesting is that for publishers that have traction with brand advertisers, they have had a problem in the past of differentiating their premium inventory from their remnant.  Here they have created a differentiated product from their remnant by simply creating a larger ad.  On top of that, they have reduced supply which will help increase rates for these premium spots.

I&#039;ve seen them on ESPN.com.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I think is interesting is that for publishers that have traction with brand advertisers, they have had a problem in the past of differentiating their premium inventory from their remnant.  Here they have created a differentiated product from their remnant by simply creating a larger ad.  On top of that, they have reduced supply which will help increase rates for these premium spots.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen them on ESPN.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

