Top 10 most obnoxious online ad formats
By Jason Menayan October 2nd, 2009Online advertising is a $65 billion worldwide business, and growing again after the past year’s economic lull. But while television ads might be Superbowl-worthy or amusingly worthy of ridicule, online ads can be downright annoying. Marketers try all sorts of novelty to make sure ads get noticed and clicked on, but, many will argue that there are more than a handful of types that go too far: eventually eye candy becomes an eyesore. Here are YieldBuild’s candidates for the most obnoxious online ad formats:
More of an annoyance 5-6 years ago before pop-up blockers got really good, the occasional ones manages to slip through every now and then, leaving us to play whack-the-mole with the close window button. Leave-behinds (that entreat you to return to the site when you’ve made it clear you want to go) and pop-unders are equally annoying cousins. Netflix, while I love its service, is a notoriously pervasive pop-up advertiser.
There is nothing quite as infuriating as opening a page and wondering why it’s screaming “helloooo?” to you. Chances are it’s an ad peddling high-res emoticons. Autoplay music is something tweeners might have become accustomed to because of MySpace, but the rest of us typically hit the close-window or back button as quickly as possible.
Autoplay video is something even the IAB is trying to step in and squelch, before advertisers overeager to replicate television-style ads turn off Web visitors for years. Often incorporating sound as well, a simple page load forces you to download and sit through noise and visual distraction unless you can be bothered to click the tiny control button to pause it.
3. Deceptive system-message ads
A favorite among malware promoters, this variant of a popup looks deceptively like a Windows or antivirus window, down to the blue control bar on top and Windows system font. They typically use confusing language, like “Do you not want to leave your computer vulnerable to viruses?” and leave you afraid to even click the red-X close-window button.
Yes, we understand the acai berry is chock full of antioxidants, but do you really need to show someone’s distended gut to make your point? And will saffron-yellow teeth scare you into buying teeth whiteners online? When I read an innocuous news article, I’m not sure I want to see the inside of a zombie’s mouth in the periphery. Who really clicks on these things?
Popular among mortgage lenders, who have cut all sorts of unsavory deals over the years, have found a bizarre form of ad that is totally unrelated to their product offering: videos of women or silhouettes dancing. They’ve faded in popularity recently, although that might not be too surprising; one look at these animations and your first thought is “subprime.”
6. Imperfect targeting
Behavioral, geo or demographic targeting that only goes part of the way ends up defeating the purpose of targeting altogether. If you live in San Francisco, for example, geotargeting that suggests you live in Hayward is not a compliment. Demographic targeting based on a geo/IP mapping may serve up the wrong types of ads when there are huge income disparities in a region. And lots of people don’t like to be reminded of discreet searches following them for weeks afterwards in the form of ads that creepily know just a little too much about you.
7. Prerolls on video clips
| RENO 911! | ||||
| Happy Happy Birthday Sue | ||||
|
||||
Video advertising makes sense for high-quality longer-form video. A total of 3 minutes of advertising on an hour-long TV show on Hulu seems more than reasonable to me (even if many of them seem to be PSAs). But a 30-second commercial before seeing an under-minute clip? You’ve got to be kidding me. As much as I love Comedy Central, I’d rather watch grainy bootleg than sit through so many prerolls ahead of their Reno 911 clips.
These Flash-based ads that run aground the page you’re trying to view can sometimes be intriguing, but usually they’re pretty annoying. And while most have a “close” button, good luck sometimes finding it. They’re hidden in a way that makes you sit through a 10-second video as your pointer dances around the ad looking for a way to close it.
I don’t know if this the right term for it, but these ads are the ones that look like simple image ads that flood into the rest of the frame, often occluding content you’re trying to look at, if you accidentally run a mouse across them. They often load video, so while you’re waiting for that clip to download, you’re staring at a blank box that’s covering the article you want to read. Finding the close/minimize button can often be tougher than finding Waldo.
The Stalker is what I call that “helpful” animated person that appears at a bottom corner of your screen and begins talking to you unsolicited. I’m not sure why the news of the Microsoft Office Paperclip pest’s demise wasn’t relayed to the creators of this ad type. And, unlike their real-world counterpart, the car salesman, the Stalker will ignore you when you curtly say, “I’m just looking.”
This entry was posted on Friday, October 2nd, 2009 at 8:37 am and is filed under Online Advertising. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.









October 2nd, 2009 at 8:52 am
And I was about to get the ‘Stalker’ on my site. Thank you for the post. I will not make that mistake now.
November 30th, 2009 at 2:21 pm
Nice post.
Actually the big boys like Facebook and Google themselves annoy the hell out of me, keep changing everything to Spanish related because I live in Spain.
However I am English and wish they would just leave things the way I want them!
January 4th, 2010 at 7:38 am
I HATE pop-up, it annoys me whever i see this type of ads, surprisingly lots of webmasters use pop-up.
August 22nd, 2010 at 5:14 pm
You do realise, your looking at this from a markters/diff point of view from the consumer, what irritates you may or may not irritate them.
If your buying inventory a lot of the above is actually profitable and can help increase returns.
@Free Dating, I would reccomend doing tests with it (try 2-3 versions of text for the live person to say) and then test it against a version without one. You could be in for a suprise!